9-11 Review
articles critiques
9-11 Research
reviews essays
9-11 Review
sections
Attack & Cover-Up
Means & Motive
Info Warfare
contents
Attack & Cover-Up
attack
timeline
World Trade Center
Twin Towers
impacts
fires
explosions
dust clouds
Building 7
implosion
Ground Zero
Pentagon attack
strike location
witnesses
impact damage
hypotheses
flights
Flights 11 and 175
Flight 77
Flight 93
psychological assault
anthrax terror
mythology
hijackers
bin Laden
crumbling towers
clueless commanders
coverup
military promotions
evidence suppression
WTC steel
WTC eyewitnesses
Pentagon
changing stories
DCANG website
Van Romero
collapse inquiry
FEMA's folly
NIST's evasion
engineering fantasies
handwaving
steel-melting fires
pile-driver
shockwave
pancaking floors
shoddy construction
progressive collapse
anthropomorphism
executive obstruction
9/11 Commission

Changing Stories

The official account of the 9/11 attack is notable for its many contradictions. Explanations of the events of that day as told by media and government have been revised numerous times in the days and years since the attacks. Some of the more prominent examples of the shifting explanations include:

Normally, when suspects in a crime investigation repeatedly change their story, it is considered strong evidence of their guilt.


page last modified: 2008-08-09
Copyright 2004 - 2011,911Review.com / revision 1.08 site last modified: 12/21/2012