Legal Subterfuge

Hilton: FEMA videos are being subpoenaed
	
"FEMA officials, who had already set up camp for Tripod II by the
morning of September 11th 2001, videotaped all of this in detail. These
videos are being subpoenaed in our lawsuit against Bush for personally
ordering 911 to happen."

*BUSH'S TWILIGHT ZONE*

WHICH PLANES REALLY STRUCK THE WTC AND PENTAGON ON 911? by Stanley G.
Hilton, Esq.

As a matter of general law, the most compelling and credible evidence in
any case is always physical evidence, such as photographs and videos.
These are objective mechanical recordings that cannot "lie."

In the case of the crimes of treason of September 11, 2001, the most
compelling evidence is the photos and videos or conspicuous lack
thereof, of the three aircraft that struck the World Trade Center and
Pentagon, the two building complexes that were hit on that Day of Infamy.

What is most striking is that a close look at the photos and video shots
of the two planes which struck the WTC show that the two planes which
struck the North and South Towers 15 minutes apart do not appear to be
American or United passenger jets, but rather unmanned Air Force "drone"
tanker planes without any windows, a special type of Boeing 757 built
for the Air Force to fuel fighter planes in the air.

The videos show that both planes that actually struck the WTC that
terrible morning had conspicuous protruding cylindrical "pods"
underneath their fuselage, and that just seconds before they struck the
WTC towers, a bright flash went off on the planes, like a match lit to
ignite the massive fuel stored in the aircraft. These pods were most
likely fitted with an incendiary device and/or a missile designed to
inflict maximum damage on the target. They were designed and deployed
for military use, but in this case George Bush personally ordered them
to be used against American citizens, thousands of them in the WTC for
blatantly political gains, in the most shameless act of Treason in our
nation's history.

When you play the videos in slow motion, at 2 percent of the actual
speed, you can clearly see the protruding, elliptical mass underneath
the fuselage of the plane and the flash of light going off just before
impact.


For analysis of these laughable claims, see:
ERROR: A Pod Was Attached to the South Tower Plane


Eyewitnesses in Manhattan who observed the planes striking the WTC
stated that "there were no windows on the planes" and that the planes
were unmarked without any insignia.


The source of this is one eyewitness in BROOKLYN who couldn't
see windows on the plane that struck the South Tower.  Duuuh!


The videos taken of Flight 175 which hit the second tower at 9:01 am
also reveal a second protruding mass underneath the fuselage near the
back of the plane, a mass that appears to be a "pod" built on the
special 757-tankers which houses the long metallic "gas pump" that
emerges from these tankers during flight, and connects with fighter jets
that fuel up in the air at these "flying gas stations." The old KC-137's
were the prototype of this technology, all produced by Boeing at its
Wichita Kansas plant.

That these aircraft were used as substitute planes to kill Americans is
shocking. That BushLies continue to cover up these crimes is still more
shocking.


There are plenty of shocking actions by Bush and Co, but covering up
fanciful ideas with no supporting evidence are not among them.


Eyewitnesses who saw the two Air Force tanker phantoms strike the WTC
reported that these planes had "no windows" and appeared to be "military
or transport planes." One called it a "spy" plane because it was
unmarked. Of course, the planes struck so fast and so suddenly and were
so high above the street level, that the normal human eye did not have
enough time to actually study the appearance of the jets with any degree
of certainty. FEMA officials, who had already set up camp for Tripod II
by the morning of September 11th 2001, videotaped all of this in detail.
These videos are being subpoenaed in our lawsuit against Bush for
personally ordering 911 to happen.

There is little question that the two planes which actually struck the
WTC on 911 were not the United and American commercial jets which had
taken off from Boston Logan Field an hour earlier, but rather unmanned
drone Air Force tankers which were operated by a remote control system
similar to the NASA 557 remote control system for 757s and 767s,
"Cyclops" navigation systems, the systems used in Global Hawks, Predator
Drones and other drone aircraft, and the GPS guided remote control
system tested by Raytheon at Holloman Air Force Base in July of 2001 .
The men at the controls were acting on orders directly issued from Bush,
Cheney and Rumsfeld.

So what happened to the real UAL and AA commercial jets that had taken
off from Boston that morning? Where did they go? What happened to their
crews and passengers?

The evidence indicates that these planes were ordered by the US Air
Force to land at an Air Force base 200 miles from New York City, where
the passengers and crew were forced off the plane, and slaughtered on
orders from Bush.


There is ZERO evidence of this.


The 19 Arab so-called hijackers were paid US double agents who served as
decoys for the real operation on Bush Day. They just followed orders to
knowing the true nature of the bit roles they were playing in what will
go down as the greatest act of treason in world history.

In a classic, brilliant and historic "military decoy operation," the
original passenger jets seem to have been replaced by these drone
aircraft somewhere between Boston and New York airspace. Furthermore,
air traffic controllers were confused by a series of "drills" that day
which were meant to send up a smokescreen of chaos, under which any
dissenting officials would be rendered neutral.

Then there is the Pentagon, where half an hour later we are told that
another 757 American Airlines passenger jet hit the building and caused
a 16-foot hole? The government has yet to release a single video to
prove their bogus allegation that a 757 smashing into the Pentagon. In
an area with the highest number of surveillance and video cameras on
earth, not a single video has been released showing clearly what
actually took place during this mysterious incident. Many eyewitnesses
reported seeing something other than a 757 strike the Pentagon and the
FBI reportedly confiscated all videotapes from all surveillance cameras
within a ten-mile radius of The Pentagon, including those from the gas
station across the street.
Stranger still is that a 757 is 125 feet wide and 155 feet long, but the
hole in the Pentagon is only 16 feet wide. The 757's tail is 20 feet
taller than the Pentagon's roof, yet no structural damage was done to
the roof upon impact.

Photographs taken immediately after the alleged strike show office
furniture still intact right at the damage site and a slice or cross
section of the floors also shows desks and filing cabinets intact. This
is totally inconsistent with the government's own theory that fuel-laden
commercial airliners struck all three buildings, the WTC Twin Towers and
the Pentagon. The government's theory asserts that the impact of the
planes and the burning of the jet fuel brought about the total
destruction of the Twin Towers. If we are to believe the government's
nonsensical theory such aircraft laden with jet fuel striking the
Pentagon would have caused massive fires that would have spread
throughout the building and impact damage destructive enough to severely
destroy a very large section of the Pentagon. What we saw instead was a
hole smaller than the aircraft alleged to have made impact and
relatively minor damage when compared with the total destruction of the
Twin Towers by what were alleged to be similar striking objects.


For analysis of the claims that a 757 did not hit the Pentagon, see:
Pentagon Attack Errors


There can be no doubt that the government's own theory is totally
inconsistent. Bush claims the same types of aircraft flown by the same
ragtag gang of Arabs and full of the same type of fuel struck both the
WTC and Pentagon, yet the damage is totally inconsistent. The two huge
towers of the WTC were totally destroyed while the Pentagon escaped with
a small 16 foot hole that could not even fit the fuselage of a 757, much
less the wing span.

Even more bizarre, there was never found any aircraft wreckage of the
757 that allegedly struck the Pentagon. The real plane appears to have
vanished into thin air.


Another huge error, see:
ERROR: The Pentagon Crash Left No Debris


What really happened at the Pentagon may be that a cruise missile was
fired at the Pentagon by an Air Force fighter-bomber that swept down the
Potomac River and this missile, which looks like a cylinder with two
small wings at the rear caused the "surgical strike" that produced the
16-foot hole.


There is no credible evidence for the involvement of a missile. See:
Pentagon Attack Eyewitnesses.


As for the crew and passengers of the real jet that had taken off from
Dulles Airport that morning, they were forced to land and murdered, like
their counterparts from Boston. The planes were commandeered into the
Air Force fleet, their serial numbers altered.


It would be difficult to concoct a story that average people would
reject as insane.  And again there is ZERO evidence of this.


Finally there is the mystery of the fourth commercial plane that took
off that morning, United Flight 93, which took off from Washington DC's
Dulles Airport, and headed for San Francisco. Unlike its three cousins,
which may have been "disappeared", this jet wound up in small pieces on
the ground in a wreck stretching a mile and a half at "Camp Bush" in
western Pennsylvania.


Here Mr. Hilton confuses Flight 93,
which took off from Newark, New Jersey, with Flight 77,
which took off from Washington DC's Dulles Airport.


The official lie is that Flight 93 was also hijacked and was heading for
the White House when heroic passengers wrestled the hijackers and either
accidentally or intentionally caused the plane to crash.
Like most of the other lies about 911, this too is a fantasy.
Why was the plane 300 miles off course, west of Washington at the time
it crashed? How is it that these super-smart terrorists whose brothers
flew with precision into the WTC and Pentagon could not even find the
course for Washington, when they had just taken off from Dulles Airport,
20 miles west of Washington itself? It would have taken them less than
ten minutes to fly the plane from Dulles to the White House, but we are
told they stayed in the air for over an hour 300 miles off course.
United Airlines flight 93 was shot down by an Air Force fighter under
the command of Dick Cheney, possibly because the pilot became suspicious
and refused to land his plane at the directions of the military. The
pilot had radioed the Pittsburgh Airport control tower for permission to
make an emergency landing, and wound up being shot down by planes of our
own military. The government won't release the Pittsburgh Control Tower
records or the black boxes.

What I believe was supposed to happen, according to the script for the
spectacular 911 stunt show on Bush Day, was that this plane like the
three others was supposed to land at an Air Force base, where the
passengers and crew were to be "disappeared" while a fourth unmanned
tanker drone 757 was supposed to strike a US military base in nearby
Ohio, as part of a larger scenario of pseudo-events produced and
directed by the Bush Administration, intended to scare the American
people into giving Bush dictatorial control powers. However, because the
pilots became recalcitrant and suspicious, they would not play along
with the script and were shot down by a military jet fighter. The fourth
plane's "mission" of treason was aborted.

In our lawsuit against Bush for High Treason and mass murder, we seek
all documents pertaining to Air Force records and commercial air traffic
control records that will reveal what really happened on 9/11/01. We
seek the black boxes to all four ill-fated jets and from the tanker
drones that really struck the WTC, which the government has thus far
refused to produce, claiming "national security."

What is really at stake is not national security but rather national
insecurity. In classical BushLies, the purpose of the Bush
administration is not to reveal, but to deceive. The 911 Whitewash
Commission, which inept and timorous congressmen put together with the
reluctant "semi-cooperation" of the White House, is a sham. It did not
address any of the issues described above. This Whitewash Commission
will surely go down as a shameful footnote in history; a glaring
testimony to the political weakness of our "democracy" and the utter
impotence and cooption of Congress.

The holocaust that BushLies have unleashed in the Middle East through
mindless wars of destruction against Afghanistan and Iraq, with more to
come, is the logical and political result of the spectacular Twilight
Zone sound-and-light show of 911. In an administration based on fraud
and chicanery, we can expect nothing else but more stunts like 911 and
more wars of aggression against harmless Third World nations replete
with oil. Bush Day, Sept. 11, was intended to be a well-planned catalyst
for galvanizing the Congress and public into supporting unlimited
aggressive wars in pursuit of a dubious political agenda. Bush has well
earned his place in History's Rogue's Gallery along such luminaries as
Hitler, Stalin and Genghis Khan.

George Bush II is guilty not only of crimes against humanity, but also
of crimes against his own people. The 3000 souls who evaporated on Bush
Day, Sep. 11, cry out for vindication. Bush's Supreme Act of Treason
makes Benedict Arnold look like George Washington.

Lincoln said "You can fool some of the people some of the time, but you
can't fool all of the people all of the time."

Let us hope he was right.

- Statement of Stanley G. Hilton, Esq. September 2004