9-11 Review
articles critiques
9-11 Research
reviews essays
9-11 Review
Attack & Cover-Up
Means & Motive
Info Warfare
Info Warfare
Trojan horses
dissembling websites
hoax-promoting videos
dissembling books
legal subterfuge
parade of errors
phantom planes
Webfairy's Whatzit
North Tower hit
South Tower hit
bumble planes
Flight 93
fake calls
Pentagon attack
757 maneuvers
no debris
crash debris
small impact hole
missing wings
turbofans 101
standing columns
small plane
Boeing 737
WTC demolition
seismic spikes
pre-impact explosions
collapse times
diminishing fires
Building 6 explosion
basement bombs
spire to dust
WTC 2 powerdown
mini nukes
pull it
vast conspiracy
divide and conquer
left gatekeepers
Holocaust denial
the Big Tent
hit parade
conspiracy theory
shell game

ERROR: 'Building 6 Was Cratered by a Huge Explosion'

An error about the World Trade Center demolition that is nearly as widespread as the errors about the total collapse times and the meaning of the seismic signals is the idea that Building 6 was cratered by a huge explosion.

The source of this myth is a CNN video frame showing a vast white dust cloud rising from an area said to be between Building 7 and the North Tower. It is claimed that the frame was taken shortly after the South Tower plane crash, while both towers were still standing. A variant of this error attributes the dust cloud to an explosion in Building 7.

In fact the frame was clearly taken just after the South Tower collapsed, and shows a column of its dust cloud rising from the World Trade Center plaza. This is obvious from an examination of the geometry of the camera vantage point and the relative positions of the buildings. The frame shows the North Tower from the North with its northeast face slightly more foreshortened than its northwest face. This guarantees that, had the South Tower been standing, about 60 percent of its northwest face would have been visible to the right of the North Tower. All that is visible to the right of the North Tower in the video frame is the smoke and dust plume from the just-collapsed South Tower.

Even ignoring the absence of the South Tower in the video frame, it is obvious from the thick white color of the dust cloud that it was not from some kind of explosion. Rather it was part of the vast dust cloud from the collapsed tower.

The severe damage to Building 6 is often cited as evidence of the alleged explosion. However there is another explanation for the damage that much better accounts for its features documented by aerial and satellite photographs of the building's exterior, such as the one on the right, and by interior photographs, such as the one on page 93 of Painful Questions. They show that the damage consisted primarily of a series of holes with the following features:

  • Run almost the height of the building
  • Have vertical walls, where the different floors have virtually identical damage profiles
  • Are mostly rectilinear in shape
  • Show metal pieces hanging down and bent down but not up
  • Mimic the profile of the North Tower's footprint, which is parallel to and has about the same length as the rectangle formed by combining the two holes. (Remains of the North Tower are visible immediately left of the two holes in Building 6.)

The last feature is a dead give-away of the real cause of the damage: primarily the thousands of tons of steel from the North Tower's northeast perimeter wall falling from as high as 1300 feet.

page last modified: 2006-12-31
Copyright 2004 - 2011,911Review.com / revision 1.08 site last modified: 12/21/2012
This image clearly shows the the rising dust cloud is from the collapse of the South Tower.
View the video.
This frame from the CNN video shows the radio tower atop the North Tower, showing that the two faces visible in the video both belong to the North Tower.
This image overlays an image from before the collapse of the South Tower, taken from the same vantage point, onto a frame of the CNN video. It clearly shows that the South Tower has already collapsed in the video segment.